Independent Remediation Validation
Your team fixed it. We prove it.
Independent manual retesting of security findings, with documented evidence of what was fixed, what remains exposed, and what needs attention.
Your team has already invested time and resources into remediating security vulnerabilities. Now you need confidence that those fixes actually work.
CyberCile independently retests findings from penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, and security reviews, including findings identified by other security providers.
Get the technical verification and documented evidence you need without commissioning another full penetration test.
Pay Per Finding | Certified Offensive Security Professionals | No New Pentest Required
A closed ticket isn't proof of a secure fix.
Your developers completed the remediation. The ticket is marked resolved. Your vulnerability scanner may even stop reporting the issue.
But has anyone independently verified that the vulnerability can no longer be exploited?
- Was the original vulnerability eliminated?
- Did the fix address the underlying cause?
- Can the issue still be exploited through another attack path?
- Did remediation introduce a new security exposure?
- Is there documented evidence supporting closure?
A closed ticket tells you the work was completed. Independent validation tells you whether the security problem was resolved.
That's where CyberCile comes in.
More than checking whether a patch was applied.
CyberCile's independent remediation validation goes beyond confirming that a configuration changed or a software update was installed.
We evaluate the security outcome.
01. Manual Exploit Retesting
We attempt to reproduce the original vulnerability against the remediated system to determine whether the reported attack path remains exploitable.
02. Root-Cause Verification
Where the finding and agreed scope permit, we evaluate whether the underlying weakness was addressed rather than merely blocking the original proof of concept.
03. Related Exposure Checks
Security changes can introduce unintended consequences. We challenge relevant remediation changes to identify directly related bypasses or regressions within scope.
04. Independent Technical Review
Your team implements the fix. CyberCile provides an independent technical assessment, including for eligible findings identified by another penetration testing provider.
05. Documented Technical Evidence
We capture applicable screenshots, requests and responses, testing observations, and evidence supporting the verification outcome.
06. Clear Closure Decisions
Every finding receives a defined outcome supported by technical reasoning, helping engineering, security, and compliance teams understand what was demonstrated.
Your fixes deserve more than a scanner check.
Tested by offensive security professionals.
Independent remediation validation requires more than rerunning an automated scanner.
CyberCile works with offensive security professionals experienced in penetration testing, exploitation, red team operations, and technical vulnerability analysis.
Our testing approach combines manual verification with tools that support technical analysis and evidence collection.
Professional Certifications
OSCP / OSCP+ | PNPT | CPTS | CBBH | CRTO | CRTP | CEH
Our testing professionals' listed credentials include:
- OSCP / OSCP+: OffSec Certified Professional
- PNPT: Practical Network Penetration Tester
- CPTS: Certified Penetration Testing Specialist
- CBBH: Certified Bug Bounty Hunter
- CRTO: Certified Red Team Operator
- CRTP: Certified Red Team Professional
- CEH: Certified Ethical Hacker
These are individual professional credentials, not organizational certifications. Credential status should be confirmed before publication, and assigned personnel may vary by engagement.
Human-led testing. Independent verification. Documented evidence.
Already have a pentest report? You don't need another pentest.
Whether your findings came from a third-party penetration test, internal security assessment, vulnerability scanner, or security review, CyberCile can independently retest eligible remediated findings.
What we can retest
- Web application vulnerabilities
- API security findings
- Authentication and authorization weaknesses
- Broken access controls
- Privilege escalation vulnerabilities
- Cloud and infrastructure misconfigurations
- Exposed services and network vulnerabilities
- Vulnerable software components
- Other reproducible security findings within an authorized scope
We focus on the findings you need verified, not selling you another full assessment.
From remediated finding to verified outcome.
A straightforward process designed to minimize disruption to your engineering and security teams.
Step 1. Submit Your Findings
Tell us which vulnerabilities have been remediated and are ready for verification.
We review the finding descriptions, affected systems, available reproduction details, and remediation context.
Sensitive reports and access information are exchanged through an approved secure process.
Step 2. Get a Fixed-Scope Quote
We evaluate the number of findings, technical complexity, required access, testing conditions, and scope.
You receive a per-finding quote and agreed verification criteria before testing begins.
Step 3. We Independently Retest
Following written authorization, CyberCile manually challenges the remediation.
Depending on the finding, testing may include:
- Reproducing the original exploit
- Evaluating authentication and access controls
- Testing relevant bypass techniques
- Verifying configuration changes
- Examining directly related attack paths
- Checking for relevant security regressions
Testing remains within the agreed scope.
Step 4. Receive Your Verification Evidence
We document the outcome of each finding, supporting technical evidence, remaining exposure, and recommended next actions.
No unnecessary meetings. No new full-scope pentest. Just the verification work you need.
Every finding gets a clear answer.
A vulnerability should not be classified as successfully remediated simply because a change was deployed.
CyberCile uses four technical verification outcomes.
VERIFIED
The original vulnerability was not reproducible through the tested attack paths, and the agreed verification criteria were satisfied.
PARTIALLY FIXED
Some aspects of the original vulnerability were remediated, but relevant security exposure remains.
NOT FIXED
The original vulnerability remains reproducible after remediation.
UNABLE TO VERIFY
Testing could not establish a reliable outcome because of insufficient access, environmental limitations, missing evidence, or other constraints.
Every outcome is supported by documented testing observations.
A Verified outcome confirms the agreed tests passed. It does not establish that the entire system is free of vulnerabilities.
Evidence you can actually use.
Your Independent Remediation Verification Report
Every completed engagement includes documentation appropriate to the agreed testing scope.
Original Finding Details
A description of the vulnerability, affected asset, original severity context, and finding reference.
Retesting Methodology
The verification approach, relevant test conditions, and actions performed.
Technical Evidence
Applicable screenshots, HTTP requests and responses, configuration observations, or other supporting artifacts.
Verification Outcome
A clear status explaining whether the original vulnerability remains reproducible under the tested conditions.
Remaining Exposure
Technical details of any unresolved weakness or directly related exposure identified during testing.
Recommended Next Actions
Practical guidance when additional remediation or verification is needed.
From remediation claims to documented evidence.
Your verification report is designed to support:
- Internal security reviews
- Engineering remediation closure
- Risk management decisions
- Customer security questionnaires
- Sponsor-bank security reviews
- Audit and compliance evidence requests
Evidence acceptance remains subject to the applicable reviewer, auditor, or compliance requirements.
When proving the fix matters.
Before an audit or compliance review
Your auditor or compliance team needs evidence that previously reported vulnerabilities were addressed.
CyberCile provides independent technical verification to support remediation closure records and applicable control assessments.
Before a customer or sponsor-bank security review
A customer, financial institution, or sponsor bank wants confirmation that reported vulnerabilities were resolved.
Provide documented retesting results rather than relying solely on remediation ticket status.
After engineering fixes a critical vulnerability
Your developers deployed a security change. Before relying on the fix, independently test whether the reported weakness remains exploitable.
After a third-party penetration test
Your original penetration testing provider identified vulnerabilities, and your team completed remediation.
CyberCile can independently retest eligible findings without requiring another full penetration test.
When a scanner reports a vulnerability as resolved
Automated scans can provide useful signals, but a finding disappearing from a scan does not always demonstrate that the underlying weakness was eliminated.
Independent manual verification provides additional technical assurance.
Only pay for the findings you need verified.
You shouldn't have to commission another full penetration test just to verify a handful of remediated findings.
CyberCile offers scoped, per-finding remediation validation.
Individual Finding Retesting
Need one critical or high-risk vulnerability verified?
Submit the finding for a scoped retest.
Multiple Finding Retesting
Completed remediation on several findings?
Request verification for the specific findings your team needs closed.
Recurring Validation
Regularly resolving findings from security scans, penetration tests, or internal assessments?
Arrange repeatable independent verification based on your needs.
Pricing is based on finding complexity, testing requirements, and agreed scope.
No mandatory long-term commitment.
For MSPs and security service providers
Your team fixes it. We independently verify it.
Your customers trust you to identify and remediate security issues. Independent verification gives them additional confidence that the remediation worked.
CyberCile supports MSPs, MSSPs, and security consultancies with manual remediation retesting and documented technical evidence.
Partner benefits
- Independent verification of customer remediation
- Per-finding testing
- Partner-friendly reporting
- Technical evidence for customer reviews
- Flexible engagement options
- No mandatory long-term contract
You manage the customer relationship and remediation process. CyberCile provides independent technical validation within the agreed scope.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need another penetration test?
No. Independent remediation validation focuses on specific previously identified vulnerabilities. A broader assessment may be recommended when the original finding cannot be reliably reproduced or the environment has materially changed.
Can CyberCile retest findings from another pentesting company?
Yes. We can independently retest eligible findings identified by other security providers, provided sufficient technical information, access, and authorization are available.
Can I submit just one finding?
Yes. Individual findings and larger batches are supported.
What if the vulnerability is still exploitable?
We document the remaining exposure, supporting evidence, and technical observations so your team can continue remediation.
Will the verification report satisfy my auditor?
CyberCile provides technical evidence to support remediation closure. Whether it satisfies a particular audit requirement depends on the framework, auditor, scope, and applicable evidence requirements.
Is retesting performed manually?
Yes. Human-led technical testing is central to our approach. Automated tools may support testing and evidence collection, but scanner status alone is not treated as proof of successful remediation.
How long does retesting take?
Turnaround depends on the number and complexity of findings, environment readiness, access requirements, and agreed scope. The delivery schedule is confirmed before testing begins.
Do we need a discovery meeting?
Not necessarily. Most requests can begin asynchronously by submitting the relevant finding information. A technical discussion is arranged when needed to clarify testing conditions or scope.
Do you guarantee that every finding will be verified as fixed?
No. Independent validation reports the observed technical outcome. Findings may be Verified, Partially Fixed, Not Fixed, or Unable to Verify.
You already invested in fixing the problem. Now verify the result.
Get independent confirmation of what was fixed, what remains exposed, and the evidence to support your next security decision.
Security You Can Stand Behind.
CyberCile LLC
support@cybercile.com
Submit findings for retest
Start with non-sensitive qualification details. Technical reports and access information follow through the approved secure exchange process.